Opinions on UK.collected.reviews sometimes show that the wealthy man rules the world. The wealthy man has easy access to means of pursuing healthy living. In times of sickness, the wealthy man also has money to foot his medical bills. The wealthy man is sometimes regarded as the healthiest man.
This is because the greater your income, the lesser your likelihood of premature death and diseases. This is because your wealth is associated with your health and longevity. Wealth management firms also concede that most wealthy persons, aside from generational diseases, are rarely plagued by sicknesses. Except in some instances, obesity.
Those who are high on the economic ladder, have the luxury to afford most of the things they want. They also have a lot of medical professionals at their beck and call. However, this isn’t the same for everyone. While those who live in the upper class have it easy, those who exist in the lower rung of the society do not. And this is the financial discrepancy that exists.
While it can’t be blamed on capitalism, this system has allowed the private acquisition of wealth. Nonetheless, access to appropriate health care is a function of your income. Just as you can’t pay for a premium health insurance package if you can’t afford it in the long run. That is, although the benefits of a premium health care insurance package are enormous, you can’t get the policy if you can’t afford it.
It has also been said that income affects life expectancy. As already stated, wealthier people access health facilities easily compared to the middle class or lower class people. Yet, Danish studies show that life expectancy isn’t influenced by income. The argument is that there is a variation of income levels, and that the population of any environment is a determinant to life expectancy rate.
The argument extends to how low-income earners also get to transcend to an upper economic ladder within their 10 years’ scope of research. That is, the low-income earners have the possibility of acquiring higher income. This, in the long run, affects the exact calculations of life expectancy with someone’s income.
Although there are Kreiner’s team studies in the PNAS journal, it can also be said that those who engage in physical labour can retain their health more than wealthy people. This is because sometimes, physical labour is a form of manual exercise which wealthy people are strange too. With this logic, the distinct stagnancy in their income doesn’t affect how healthy they are, it only affects what they could afford.
There is a pervasive inequality in universal life expectancy. Although there is a widening gap of inequality, there are public health programs created to tackle these issues of a short lifetime for low-income earners. In the UK, while low-income earners may not afford health care insurance, the hospital, NHS, has stepped in to help those who require health care services. And while this service may not be extended to everyone, there is a maximal chance that every lower income earner is a recipient.